期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

International Journal of Medicine and Data. 2022; 6: (2) ; 50-52 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.ijmd.20220049.

To analyze the clinical value of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation
分析腰椎间盘突出MRI和CT诊断的临床价值

作者: 陈晓蕾 *

山东省诸城市人民医院 山东诸城

*通讯作者: 陈晓蕾,单位:山东省诸城市人民医院 山东诸城;

发布时间: 2022-07-19 总浏览量: 360

摘要

目的 探讨在腰椎间盘突出症患者诊断中分别应用MRI与CT检查的诊断价值。方法 试验对象选于2021.01-2021.12期间,在本院就医的腰椎间盘突出症患者72例,以随机盲选法均分作2组,分别以CT检查(对照组)与MRI检查(观察组),统计诊断结果差异性。结果 观察组神经根受压、硬囊膜受压、脊髓变形及椎间盘变性检出率比对照组高,P<0.05;观察组钙化及椎间盘积气检出率比对照组低,P<0.05。结论 以MRI与CT方式实施诊断,均可得到一定诊断效果,但与CT检查相比,MRI检查准确率较高,临床需结合患者具体情况合理选择检查方式,为后续制定诊疗计划提供可靠依据。

关键词: MRI;CT;腰椎间盘突出;准确性;检出率

Abstract

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of patients with lumbar disc herniation.
Methods the subjects were 72 patients with lumbar disc herniation treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2021. They were randomly and blindly divided into two groups. They were examined by CT (control group) and MRI (observation group). The differences of diagnostic results were statistically analyzed.
Results the detection rates of nerve root compression, hard capsule compression, spinal cord deformation and intervertebral disc degeneration in the observation group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05); The detection rates of calcification and pneumointervertebral disc in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion   MRI and CT can achieve certain diagnostic results, but compared with CT, MRI has a higher accuracy. Clinically, it is necessary to reasonably select the examination method in combination with the specific situation of patients, so as to provide a reliable basis for the follow-up diagnosis and treatment plan.

Key words: MRI; CT; lumbar disc protrusion; Accuracy; Detection rate

参考文献 References

[1] 谢达科,韦琳,唐运军等. CT联合MRI在腰椎间盘突出症患者中的诊断效果及诊断ROC效能研究[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(05):52-53+56.

[2] 郭付勇. 多层螺旋CT与磁共振对腰椎间盘突出症的诊断价值对比[J]. 现代诊断与治疗,2021,32(18):2955-2956.

[3] 中华医学会骨科学分会脊柱外科学组, 中华医学会骨科学分会骨科康复学组. 腰椎间盘突出症诊疗指南[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2020, 40(08):477-487.

[4] 王立国,孙峰,刘鑫婷. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的准确性和临床体会[J]. 影像研究与医学应用,2021,5(17):149-150.

[5] 陈章远. 腰椎CT连扫重建腰椎间盘模式在腰椎间盘突出症患者诊断中的应用价值探究[J]. 基层医学论坛,2021,25(17):2456-2457.

[6] 薛强弘,郑源,倪志祥等. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用价值及准确性分析[J]. 现代医用影像学,2021,30(09):1604-1606+1621.

[7] 刘为英. X线平片检查、CT检查及MRI检查诊断腰椎间盘突出症的效果观察[J]. 中国医疗器械信息,2021,27(06):109-110.

[8] 刘永, 滕云. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的临床价值分析[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2016, 26(9):3.

[9] 谢春艳, 崔鑫鹏, 周海军,等. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用的价值分析[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2017, 26(5):3.

[10] 杨文兵, 孟连英. 腰椎间盘突出症MRI与CT诊断的应用价值分析[J]. 中国实用医药, 2016(9):2.

[11] 王书涛. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用的价值分析[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2018(2):2.

[12] 王红霞. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用价值分析[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2015(66):1.

[13] 尹生江. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的临床价值对比[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(33):2.

[14] 杨永胜. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用的价值分析[J]. 大家健康旬刊, 2017.

[15] 辛立旭, 姚立正, 李新. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的效果对比[J]. 临床医药文献杂志(电子版), 2016.

[16] 王富江. 分析腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的效果[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版), 2016.

[17] 孙野. 分析腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用效果差异[J].  2021.

[18] 严君. 腰椎间盘突出症MRI与CT诊断的应用意义[J]. 影像研究与医学应用 2021年5卷22期, 145-146页, 2022.

[19] 李会连, 游兴攀. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的临床价值对比及分析[J]. 名医, 2020.

[20] 刘晓. 对比分析腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的差异性[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2020.

[21] 李小淑. 比较腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的准确性及临床价值[J]. 家庭保健, 2020.

[22] 莫荣广, 申霞. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的临床应用价值评估及效果比较[J]. 医学食疗与健康, 2019(16).

[23] 赵贵本. 腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用价值比较[J]. 大家健康(下旬版), 2016, 010(008):54-55.

引用本文

陈晓蕾, 分析腰椎间盘突出MRI和CT诊断的临床价值[J]. 国际医学与数据杂志, 2022; 6: (2) : 50-52.