Comparative analysis of the efficacy of aerobic exercise intervention and routine activity guidance in the rehabilitation of patients after acute myocardial infarction surgery
有氧运动干预与常规活动指导在急性心肌梗死术后患者康复中的疗效差异分析

摘要

目的 探讨有氧运动干预与常规活动指导在急性心肌梗死术后患者康复中的临床疗效差异。方法 选取89例急性心肌梗死术后患者，采用随机数字表法分为康复组（44例）和对照组（45例）。康复组采用有氧运动干预，对照组采用常规活动指导。比较两组患者的治疗效果和药物不良反应发生情况。结果 康复组总有效率为97.73%（43/44），显著高于对照组的80.00%（36/45），差异有统计学意义。在药物不良反应方面，康复组总不良反应发生率为2.27%（1/44），对照组为6.67%（3/45），两组比较差异无统计学意义。结论 有氧运动干预较常规活动指导能显著提高急性心肌梗死术后患者的康复效果，且安全性良好，值得在临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To explore the differences in clinical efficacy between aerobic exercise intervention and routine activity guidance in the rehabilitation of patients after acute myocardial infarction surgery.
Methods A total of 89 patients who had undergone surgery for acute myocardial infarction were selected and divided into the rehabilitation group (44 cases) and the control group (45 cases) using a random number table method. The rehabilitation group received aerobic exercise intervention, while the control group received routine activity guidance. The therapeutic effects and the incidence of adverse drug reactions were compared between the two groups.
Results The total effective rate in the rehabilitation group was 97.73% (43/44), which was significantly higher than that in the control group at 80.00% (36/45), with statistical significance. Regarding adverse drug reactions, the total incidence in the rehabilitation group was 2.27% (1/44), and in the control group, it was 6.67% (3/45); the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.
Conclusion   Aerobic exercise intervention can significantly improve the rehabilitation outcomes of patients after acute myocardial infarction surgery compared with routine activity guidance, and it has good safety. It is worth promoting and applying in clinical practice.