Analysis on the Causes of Error of Clinical Forensic Expert Opinion
法医临床司法鉴定意见错误产生原因探析

摘要

随着我国社会经济和科学技术的高度发展，各行业的发展都取得了一定的成就，其中医学上的一些鉴定手法也越来越高明，对于一些案件中的伤亡人士或其他进行临床鉴定的同时，需要法医来进行，而对于法医临床鉴定的意见一般会作为科学依据，具备科学性、专业性的特点，而在刑事诉讼法八类证据中，法医的临床司法鉴定意见属于最为信任的证据类型之一，但是在实际鉴定过程中，由于受法医个人经验、仪器设备、技术标准和方法等的影响，导致最终的鉴定意见可能存在偏差，而这一不确定性也会导致冤假错案的发生，对于案情审查来说会造成一定的影响。基于此，本文就法医临床司法鉴定意见的错误以及错误产生原因进行分析，以此为参考。

Abstract

With the rapid development of our society, economy and science and technology, the development of various industries has made certain achievements, among which, some medical identification techniques are becoming more and more sophisticated. For the clinical identification of casualties in some cases or other cases, forensic doctors are needed to carry out, and opinions on forensic clinical identification are generally used as scientific basis. It is scientific and professional. Among the eight types of evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law, the clinical forensic opinion is one of the most trusted types of evidence. However, in the actual appraisal process, due to the influence of the personal experience of the medical examiner, equipment, technical standards and methods, the final forensic opinion may be biased. This uncertainty will also lead to the occurrence of miscarriages of justice, which will have a certain impact on the case investigation. Based on this, this paper analyzes the errors and causes of clinical forensic expert opinions, and takes this as a reference.